EVIDENCE & TRANSPARENCY • NOVEMBER 2, 2026

A vision with
clear foundations.

This website brings together the supplied HTML, presentation, formation document, and founding research discussion. It distinguishes the venture’s intentions from established facts.

How the supplied materials were used

Technology: demonstrated pathway, proposed deployment

SkyNano reports that it produced carbon nanotubes from real power-plant flue gas. Oak Ridge National Laboratory also describes SkyNano’s collection of flue gas from TVA’s John Sevier Combined Cycle Plant and subsequent nanotube production. These sources support a demonstrated technology pathway, not a completed Divine Stewardship installation or universally proven commercial economics.

SkyNano — Converts Flue Gas into Useful Carbon Nanotubes ↗

Oak Ridge National Laboratory — SkyNano research and facility background ↗

No supplied signed agreement establishes a Divine Stewardship license or partnership with SkyNano, a utility, a host facility, a church, or a customer. The website therefore describes a proposed pathway. Named companies and facilities are referenced for context; no endorsement or affiliation is implied.

Carbon materials may retain carbon in useful products, but permanent storage and net climate benefits cannot be inferred from product manufacture alone. Energy sources, process emissions, product lifetime, and disposal must be assessed. The website does not claim verified permanent sequestration.

Planning numbers: assumptions, not forecasts

The original HTML says carbon nanotubes command “$40–$85+ per ton” while calculating sales at approximately $40,000 per ton. The research discussion likewise uses $40,000 per metric ton. The website resolves that inconsistency by treating $40,000 as an explicit, editable scenario input—not a current market quotation. Grade, quantity, purity, customer qualification, and contracted demand determine realizable prices.

The model uses 22% saleable carbon mass yield as an editable assumption taken from the supplied research. It is not represented as verified SkyNano performance. The theoretical carbon mass available from CO₂ is approximately 12/44, or 27.27%, before losses and product-quality requirements; the model caps the yield input at that level.

Illustrative gross material sales = CO₂ processed × assumed saleable mass yield × assumed price. At 100 metric tons/year, 22%, and $40,000/metric ton, that equals 22 metric tons of material and $880,000 in gross sales, assuming every saleable ton finds a buyer.

The arithmetic excludes capital spending, energy, labor, licensing, maintenance, purification, safety, site integration, insurance, financing, taxes, and other expenses. It is not net profit. The source’s large plant-level revenue projections, payback claims, low-risk descriptions, and assumed capital budgets have not been adopted as forecasts. Market demand cannot be assumed to grow linearly with production.

§45Q is conditional

The current statutory text sets an annual capture minimum of 18,750 metric tons for an electricity-generating facility and a capture-design requirement of at least 75% of the applicable unit’s baseline production. Other industrial facilities generally have a 12,500-metric-ton annual minimum; direct-air-capture facilities have a separate 1,000-metric-ton threshold.

A standalone 100–500-metric-ton/year pilot is below those annual thresholds. The website therefore does not include the original materials’ $8,500–$42,500 annual pilot-credit claims. Any eligibility through a larger qualifying installation would require a specific legal and technical assessment.

The available credit amount also depends on the applicable statutory regime, placed-in-service date, labor requirements, and other conditions. Product utilization requires lifecycle analysis and IRS approval under the applicable rules. Producing nanotubes does not automatically establish a credit.

26 U.S.C. §45Q, especially subsections (d) and (f)(5) ↗
IRS Notice 2024-60 — utilization lifecycle-analysis submissions ↗

Ownership, taxation, and grant eligibility

The proposed church-owned commercial model requires professional structuring. LLC formation does not by itself resolve federal tax classification, unrelated business income, exempt-status questions, private benefit, reasonable compensation, or conflict management. The supplied formation document does not establish church ownership or a corporate tax election. The website makes no claim that those matters are settled.

The original research’s assertion that a 100%-church-owned subsidiary automatically qualifies for SBIR/STTR is not reliable. SBA’s published eligibility guide generally requires majority ownership and control by qualifying U.S. individuals or specified qualifying for-profit concerns, subject to enumerated exceptions. A church-owned subsidiary cannot assume it satisfies those requirements simply by being for-profit or obtaining a UEI. The precise applicant structure and solicitation must be reviewed before relying on an award.

SBA — Guide to SBIR/STTR Program Eligibility, ownership and control ↗

References in the founding discussion to DOE, NYSERDA, and other grant or incentive programs are research leads. This website does not claim current solicitation availability, applicant eligibility, awarded funding, or guaranteed procurement.

Regional candidates and project status

Texas, New York, Maryland, and New Jersey are preserved as the geographic scope of the source materials. Facility names are candidate references from those materials. They are not a list of participating sites, confirmed operating units, verified emissions baselines, or secured projects.

The original HTML’s “Dallas–Midlothian LNG Plant” identification has not been substantiated and should not be used in a formal proposal without verification. The 2026–2028 deployment window in that HTML is a proposed planning window, not an approved project schedule. No construction start or launch date is promised here.

Website functions and imagery

The scenario calculator operates in your browser. Its download is a local text file. The inquiry form prepares a downloadable brief; it does not send information, book a meeting, or create a submitted lead. The site does not invent a company email address or telephone number.

The forest hero is an AI-created illustrative landscape, not a project site. The energy-and-creation landscape was supplied for this venture. Its location and provenance have not been independently established; it is presented as an illustration of the venture’s stewardship vision, not as a participating facility, verified emissions outcome, or promise of environmental performance. The church image comes from the supplied presentation and is illustrative, not a claim of a participating congregation or company property. The carbon graphic is a conceptual design, not microscopy, a reactor schematic, or evidence of a manufactured product.

Typography uses unmodified URW Base35 P052 font files. Font copyright and license; upstream font source.